From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue May 13 08:50:53 2008 Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:44:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Frank Naumann X-X-Sender: fnaumann@localhost.localdomain To: Alan Hourihane Cc: mint Subject: Re: [MiNT] ext2 8GB ?? In-Reply-To: <1210682248.10283.16.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <1210244835.10300.11.camel@localhost> <1210265089.10300.18.camel@localhost> <1210403367.11782.23.camel@localhost> <1210674695.10283.3.camel@localhost> <1210679268.10283.14.camel@localhost> <1210682248.10283.16.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=- tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 WHITELISTED X-Spam-Level: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: fnaumann@boerde.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Hello Alan! >> Thank you very much. Did you compiled the ext2.xfs with the gcc 4.2.3? Or >> is the ext2.xfs compiled with gcc 2.95.3? > > ext2.xfs compiled with gcc 4.2.3 Can you compile and test the ext2.xfs with gcc 2.95.3 to verify that it's not a problem with the compiler? The gcc 4.2 is not very well tested, specially with -mshort I think. Regards, Frank -- ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060 ----------------------------- http://sparemint.org/ e-Mail: fnaumann@boerde.de